The Cult of Sam Altman

Why we should be Uneasy

There’s a growing mythology around Sam Altman. You’ve seen it—maybe even shared in it. The startup savant who went from Loopt to Y Combinator to OpenAI. The architect of artificial general intelligence. The billionaire who stockpiles iodine pills, leads nuclear energy companies, and quotes sci-fi novels like scripture.

But here’s a question I’ve been wrestling with:
What if we’re mistaking inevitability for wisdom?

Because Altman isn’t just building tools. He’s shaping systems and concentrating power. Rewriting incentives. And we’re all just supposed to be okay with that?

The Startup Whisperer Who Became AI’s Gatekeeper

Let’s start with what’s undeniable: Altman helped scale Y Combinator into a force that made Silicon Valley feel less like a club and more like an operating system. That’s real. I’ve seen founders rewire their ambitions because of how YC trained them to think bigger, move faster, and raise smarter.

But at some point, ambition stopped being the means and became the brand.

OpenAI was founded with a nonprofit mission: to democratize artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity. The moment Microsoft backed up the truck with billions, the mission evolved. Altman spun it as a necessary compromise. But let’s call it what it was: a pivot from idealism to realism—driven by compute, money, and power.

And maybe that was inevitable. But if he’s going to wear the crown of the future, then we should at least be asking: Who holds him accountable?

The Altman Paradox: Builder or Prophet?

What makes Altman so compelling is what also makes him dangerous: he doesn’t just build products, he sells visions. He talks about “the gentle singularity” like it’s a certainty. He speaks with the confidence of someone who knows he’s the smartest guy in the room—and is already thinking ten moves ahead.

But there’s a fine line between visionary and monopolist. OpenAI doesn’t just lead the market—it defines the narrative. It gets to decide what “safe” AI looks like. It gets to decide who gets access, when, and under what terms. That’s not open. That’s not neutral. That’s power disguised as stewardship.

If Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk behaved like this, we’d be calling it out. But with Altman, there’s still this halo—because he says the right things, with the right tone, and the right hint of vulnerability.

But don’t be fooled: he’s playing the game better than anyone.

The Prepper, the Politician, and the Nuclear Play

I’ll give him credit—he plays multiple games at once. On one hand, he’s prepping for civilizational collapse with a compound in Big Sur. On the other hand, he’s chairing Helion and Oklo, betting on nuclear energy as the lifeblood of an AI future. And in the background, he’s quietly amassing influence across policy circles, global think tanks, and media.

This isn’t a guy hedging his bets.

This is a guy building a new stack for civilization—AI at the top, nuclear in the middle, Altman at the center.

And most people are too dazzled to notice.

What We Should Be Talking About

I’m not here to cancel Altman. Frankly, I admire his ability to think long-term in a world that is increasingly focused on quarterly returns. But I do think we need to ask the harder questions:

• Who gets to shape the AI systems that will mediate our lives?

• Why are the same few people consolidating power across compute, capital, and cognition?

• Are we building tech that frees us or makes us dependent on their benevolence?

These aren’t hypotheticals. These are now questions. And Altman, for better or worse, is at the center of all of them.

Why I’m Writing This

Because too many smart people I know are treating Sam Altman like a North Star. And I get it—he’s brilliant. He’s composed. He’s five steps ahead.

But sometimes, being five steps ahead means no one’s around to challenge you.

And if we’re serious about shaping a better future, then we need more than founders. We need critics. Builders who interrogate their tools. Visionaries who welcome dissent.

Altman may be forging the fire.

But it’s up to the rest of us to make sure we don’t get burned.

Want more essays like this? Get raw insights into the minds shaping tomorrow. No fluff, no worship.